Self-Represented Parties (Fairness)

Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved:	2024-11-24
CLNP Page ID:	2022
Page Categories:
Citation:	Self-Represented Parties (Fairness), CLNP 2022, <>, retrieved on 2024-11-24
Editor:	Sharvey
Last Updated:	2022/11/13

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076

Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today

Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Hylton, 2010 ONCA 752 (CanLII)

[39] Once again, the fact that a party is self-represented is a relevant factor. That is not to say that a self-represented party is entitled to a “pass”. However, as part of the court’s obligation to ensure that all litigants have a fair opportunity to advance their positions, the court must assist self-represented parties so they can present their cases to the best of their abilities. Linhares de Sousa J. provided a helpful list of ways to assist self-represented litigants in Kainz v. Potter (2006), 2006 CanLII 20532 (ON SC), 33 R.F.L. (6th) 62 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 65:

[N]umerous Court decisions have reiterated the principle again and again, that self-represented parties are entitled to receive assistance from an adjudicator to permit them to fairly present their case on the issues in question. This may include directions on procedure, the nature of the evidence that can be presented, the calling of witnesses, the form of questioning, requests for adjournments and even the raising of substantive and evidentiary issues. [Emphasis added.]