View source for Tenants Named Incorrectly (LTB)

Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

• The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, editors.
• You do not have permission to edit pages in the Case Law namespace.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page.

[[Category:Defective Notice (LTB)]] {{Citation: | categories = [Defective Notice (LTB)] | shortlink = 42 }} ==SWT-09323-17 (Re), 2018 CanLII 42486 (ON LTB)<ref name="SWT-09323-17"/>== <b><u>21. Although the Landlord served the Tenant a first N5 Notice, which I found to be flawed because he failed to name all of the Tenants</b></u> and failed to provide sufficient details or give enough time between the date of service and the termination date, the Landlord said he served the notice after speaking with the police and other tenants. In any event, the Tenant had the opportunity to void that notice. Further, it was the Tenant who contacted the Landlord on October 11, 2017, 8 days after receiving the N5 Notice saying she was moving October 15, 2017 and wanted her portion of the rent as well as her portion of the last month's rent deposit returned to her. More interestingly, the Tenant testified she moved because the other girls made her feel unsafe. <ref name="SWT-09323-17">SWT-09323-17 (Re), 2018 CanLII 42486 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/hs07t>, retrieved on 2021-03-18</ref> ==References==

Return to Tenants Named Incorrectly (LTB).