Estoppel: Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Blanked the page)
Tag: Blanking
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Legal Principles]]
[[Category:Small Claims]]
[[Category:Landlord Tenant]]


==The Defence of Estoppel==
===[http://canlii.ca/t/1j0dz BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. v. Wellington West Capital Inc., 2004 CanLII 33776 (ON SC)]===
[24]      To assert estoppel by convention, a party must demonstrate that both parties embarked upon a course of conduct based upon the same premise or assumption. See Amalgamated Investment & Property Co. Ltd. (in liquidation) v. Texas Commerce International Bank Ltd., [1982] 1 Q.B. 84 at 122 (C.A.) per Denning M.R.

Latest revision as of 16:03, 21 February 2020