Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
|
|
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:Human Rights]]
| |
| [[Category:Landlord Tenant]]
| |
|
| |
|
| ==[http://canlii.ca/t/fr2mb J.O v. London District Catholic School Board, 2012 HRTO 732 (CanLII)]==
| |
|
| |
| [49] The parties devoted most of their efforts in this case to the issue of accommodation. However, as the Tribunal noted in Baber v. York Region District School Board, 2011 HRTO 213 (CanLII), the duty to accommodate is not a free standing obligation under the Code. Rather, it arises only pursuant to sections 11, 17 or 24 of the Code where a person is disadvantaged because of a prohibited ground of discrimination and the respondent defends its otherwise discriminatory actions. The Supreme Court of Canada noted in Meoirin and Grismer that the inquiry moves to the bona fides of the requirement in question only if a prima facie case has been made out that the requirement is discriminatory. In other words, the duty to accommodate arises only where an applicant has been subject to direct or adverse effect discrimination. The applicant bears the onus of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination, which, if established, shifts the evidentiary burden to the respondent to show that it accommodated the applicant to the point of undue hardship.
| |
Latest revision as of 02:04, 17 December 2019
