Qualified Privilege: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Category:Legal Principles Category:Small Claims Categoty:Landlord Tenant [76] I also find that qualified privilege applies to Mr. Semen’s complaint to police....") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Legal Principles]] | [[Category:Legal Principles]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Hearing Process (LTB)]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Definitions (Re: Legal Usage)]] | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/hzkgl Murphy v. Sutton Group, 2019 ONSC 2078 (CanLII)]== | |||
[76] I also find that qualified privilege applies to Mr. Semen’s complaint to police. <b><u>A complaint or communication of information to police is potentially subject to qualified privilege;</b></u> [http://canlii.ca/t/gg863 Caron v A. (Litigation guardian of), 2015 BCCA 47 (CanLII) at para. 37]. <b><u>Qualified privilege protects a person seeking to report criminal activity by making a statement or complaint to police, who share a corresponding public interest to receive the information for investigative purposes;</b></u> [http://canlii.ca/t/6g1n Gittens v. Brown, 2003 CanLII 40565 (ON SC) at para. 30]. '''Qualified privilege serves to "rebut the inference, which normally arises from the publication of defamatory words, that they were spoken with malice. ... However, the privilege is not absolute and can be defeated if the dominant motive for publishing the statement is actual or express malice;"''' [http://canlii.ca/t/1frgn Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), (1995) 2 S.C.R. 1130 (S.C.C.) at para. 144]. A person who makes a complaint to police in good faith for their help is protected by a qualified privilege; [http://canlii.ca/t/hpx4q Cook v. Milborne, 2018 ONSC 419 (CanLII) at paras 23 and 25], citing [http://canlii.ca/t/1tn0b Cusson v. Quan, 2007 ONCA 771 (CanLII) at para 39]; [http://canlii.ca/t/hwvl5 Kolosov v. Loews Companies, 2018 ONSC 7541 (CanLII) at para. 463]. | [76] I also find that qualified privilege applies to Mr. Semen’s complaint to police. <b><u>A complaint or communication of information to police is potentially subject to qualified privilege;</b></u> [http://canlii.ca/t/gg863 Caron v A. (Litigation guardian of), 2015 BCCA 47 (CanLII) at para. 37]. <b><u>Qualified privilege protects a person seeking to report criminal activity by making a statement or complaint to police, who share a corresponding public interest to receive the information for investigative purposes;</b></u> [http://canlii.ca/t/6g1n Gittens v. Brown, 2003 CanLII 40565 (ON SC) at para. 30]. '''Qualified privilege serves to "rebut the inference, which normally arises from the publication of defamatory words, that they were spoken with malice. ... However, the privilege is not absolute and can be defeated if the dominant motive for publishing the statement is actual or express malice;"''' [http://canlii.ca/t/1frgn Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), (1995) 2 S.C.R. 1130 (S.C.C.) at para. 144]. A person who makes a complaint to police in good faith for their help is protected by a qualified privilege; [http://canlii.ca/t/hpx4q Cook v. Milborne, 2018 ONSC 419 (CanLII) at paras 23 and 25], citing [http://canlii.ca/t/1tn0b Cusson v. Quan, 2007 ONCA 771 (CanLII) at para 39]; [http://canlii.ca/t/hwvl5 Kolosov v. Loews Companies, 2018 ONSC 7541 (CanLII) at para. 463]. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 16 August 2021
Murphy v. Sutton Group, 2019 ONSC 2078 (CanLII)
[76] I also find that qualified privilege applies to Mr. Semen’s complaint to police. A complaint or communication of information to police is potentially subject to qualified privilege; Caron v A. (Litigation guardian of), 2015 BCCA 47 (CanLII) at para. 37. Qualified privilege protects a person seeking to report criminal activity by making a statement or complaint to police, who share a corresponding public interest to receive the information for investigative purposes; Gittens v. Brown, 2003 CanLII 40565 (ON SC) at para. 30. Qualified privilege serves to "rebut the inference, which normally arises from the publication of defamatory words, that they were spoken with malice. ... However, the privilege is not absolute and can be defeated if the dominant motive for publishing the statement is actual or express malice;" Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), (1995) 2 S.C.R. 1130 (S.C.C.) at para. 144. A person who makes a complaint to police in good faith for their help is protected by a qualified privilege; Cook v. Milborne, 2018 ONSC 419 (CanLII) at paras 23 and 25, citing Cusson v. Quan, 2007 ONCA 771 (CanLII) at para 39; Kolosov v. Loews Companies, 2018 ONSC 7541 (CanLII) at para. 463.
