Duty of Fairness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Legal Principles]] | [[Category:Legal Principles]] | ||
==Harrison v. Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, 2006 CanLII 33670 (ON SCDC)== | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = [Legal Principles] | |||
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/5u | |||
}} | |||
==Harrison v. Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, 2006 CanLII 33670 (ON SCDC)<ref name="Harrison"/>== | |||
[24]In Brown and Evans, supra, at 8-20, the authors conclude that a tribunal will generally only be required “otherwise by law to hold a hearing” if the procedural content of the duty of fairness applicable to the tribunal includes the essential aspects of an adjudicative hearing. | [24]In Brown and Evans, supra, at 8-20, the authors conclude that a tribunal will generally only be required “otherwise by law to hold a hearing” if the procedural content of the duty of fairness applicable to the tribunal includes the essential aspects of an adjudicative hearing. | ||
[25] The content of the duty of fairness is variable, as the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817. Its content depends on a number of factors, including the following: | [25] The content of the duty of fairness is variable, as the Supreme Court of Canada stated in <i>Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.</i><ref name="Baker"/> Its content depends on a number of factors, including the following: | ||
::1. the nature of the decision being made; | ::1. the nature of the decision being made; | ||
| Line 17: | Line 22: | ||
::5. the choices of procedure made by the agency itself (at paras. 22-27). | ::5. the choices of procedure made by the agency itself (at paras. 22-27). | ||
<ref name="Baker">Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 817, <https://canlii.ca/t/1fqlk>, retrieved on 2023-05-13</ref> | |||
<ref name="Harrison">Harrison v. Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, 2006 CanLII 33670 (ON SCDC), <http://canlii.ca/t/1pqmb>, retrieved on 2020-08-23</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:01, 13 May 2023
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-23 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 870 |
| Page Categories: | [Legal Principles] |
| Citation: | Duty of Fairness, CLNP 870, <https://rvt.link/5u>, retrieved on 2024-11-23 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2023/05/13 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
Harrison v. Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, 2006 CanLII 33670 (ON SCDC)[1]
[24]In Brown and Evans, supra, at 8-20, the authors conclude that a tribunal will generally only be required “otherwise by law to hold a hearing” if the procedural content of the duty of fairness applicable to the tribunal includes the essential aspects of an adjudicative hearing.
[25] The content of the duty of fairness is variable, as the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.[2] Its content depends on a number of factors, including the following:
- 1. the nature of the decision being made;
- 2. the nature of the statutory scheme;
- 3. the importance of the decision to the individual or individuals affected;
- 4. the legitimate expectations of the person challenging the decision; and
- 5. the choices of procedure made by the agency itself (at paras. 22-27).
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Harrison v. Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, 2006 CanLII 33670 (ON SCDC), <http://canlii.ca/t/1pqmb>, retrieved on 2020-08-23
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 817, <https://canlii.ca/t/1fqlk>, retrieved on 2023-05-13
