Motion to Dismiss (Frivolous)(LTB): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Appeals]] | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/j5n16 Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/j5n16 Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)]== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 27 September 2020
Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)
[24] It is difficult to assess whether the Tenant raises an error of law or whether it has any merit.
[25] An alleged error of law does not clearly appear from the Notice of Appeal. Yet, given that he is self-represented, the Notice of Appeal must be read liberally.
[26] The issue is whether the adjournment should or should not have been granted. While the appeal looks extremely “thin”, it is possible that it raises a genuine issue of law, I am not prepared to dismiss the appeal and deprive the Tenant a full opportunity to make submissions why his appeal should be granted.
