Procedural Fairness - Re: Principles of: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Co-Operative Housing (LTB)]] | [[Category:Co-Operative Housing (LTB)]] | ||
[[Category:Legal Principles]] | [[Category:Legal Principles]] | ||
[[Category:Appeals]] | |||
==Ontario Football Conference v. Brampton Minor Football Association, 2020 ONSC 1061 (CanLII)<ref name="Football"/>== | ==Ontario Football Conference v. Brampton Minor Football Association, 2020 ONSC 1061 (CanLII)<ref name="Football"/>== | ||
Revision as of 14:10, 27 September 2020
Ontario Football Conference v. Brampton Minor Football Association, 2020 ONSC 1061 (CanLII)[1]
[23] The fundamental principles associated with the administration of justice and civil procedure include the need to ensure that justice not only be done but be seen to be done, following a procedure that is just and fair. The duty of procedural fairness requires that litigants have the opportunity to present their case fully and fairly. Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817 (S.C.C.), at paragraph 28[2]; Ariston Realty Corp. v. Elcarim Inc., [2007] O.J. No. 1497 (S.C.J.), at paragraph 29.[3]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Ontario Football Conference v. Brampton Minor Football Association, 2020 ONSC 1061 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j5jlr>, retrieved on 2020-09-27
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 817, <http://canlii.ca/t/1fqlk>, retrieved on 2020-09-27
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Ariston Realty Corp. v. Elcarim Inc., 2007 CanLII 13360 (ON SC), <http://canlii.ca/t/1r7zd>, retrieved on 2020-09-27
