Consortium (Meaning of): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Legal Principles Category:Tort law ==V et al. v. C et al., 1972 CanLII 495 (ON SC)<ref name="VC"/>== There is also a modern case in the Supreme Court of Can...") |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<ref name="Kungl">Kungl v. Schiefer, 1962 CanLII 5 (SCC), [1962] SCR 443, <http://canlii.ca/t/1tvr9>, retrieved on 2020-10-16</ref> | <ref name="Kungl">Kungl v. Schiefer, 1962 CanLII 5 (SCC), [1962] SCR 443, <http://canlii.ca/t/1tvr9>, retrieved on 2020-10-16</ref> | ||
<ref name="KungCA">Kungl v. Schiefer, 1960 CanLII 22 (ON CA), <http://canlii.ca/t/1vjnk>, retrieved on 2020-10-16</ref> | <ref name="KungCA">Kungl v. Schiefer, 1960 CanLII 22 (ON CA), <http://canlii.ca/t/1vjnk>, retrieved on 2020-10-16</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 16 October 2020
V et al. v. C et al., 1972 CanLII 495 (ON SC)[1]
There is also a modern case in the Supreme Court of Canada dealing with consortium and the bases of Ontario jurisdiction:
- Kungl v. Schiefer, 1962 CanLII 5 (SCC), [1962] S.C.R. 443, 33 D.L.R. (2d) 278[2], on appeal from 1960 CanLII 22 (ON CA), [1961] O.R. 1, 25 D.L.R. (2d) 344 (C.A.)[3]. There the Courts were concerned with whether there existed an action for alienation of affections in Ontario and concluded that there was not. At p. 7 O.R., p. 350 D.L.R., of the Court of Appeal judgment Schroeder, J.A., says:
- The term "consortium" is not susceptible of precise or complete definition but broadly speaking, companionship, love, affection, comfort, mutual services, sexual intercourse
- -- all belonging to the marriage state -- taken together make up what we refer to as consortium.
- The term "consortium" is not susceptible of precise or complete definition but broadly speaking, companionship, love, affection, comfort, mutual services, sexual intercourse
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 V et al. v. C et al., 1972 CanLII 495 (ON SC), <http://canlii.ca/t/g1c6d>, retrieved on 2020-10-16
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedKung - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedKunglCA - ↑ Kungl v. Schiefer, 1962 CanLII 5 (SCC), [1962] SCR 443, <http://canlii.ca/t/1tvr9>, retrieved on 2020-10-16
- ↑ Kungl v. Schiefer, 1960 CanLII 22 (ON CA), <http://canlii.ca/t/1vjnk>, retrieved on 2020-10-16
