Prepayment of Rent: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Category: Landlord Tenant ===[http://canlii.ca/t/h59f0 SWT-01750-17 (Re), 2017 CanLII 51511 (ON LTB)]=== 10. Pursuant to section 106 of the RTA, a Landlord may require...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category: Landlord Tenant]] | [[Category: Landlord Tenant]] | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/h59f0 SWT-01750-17 (Re), 2017 CanLII 51511 (ON LTB)]== | |||
10. Pursuant to section 106 of the RTA, a Landlord may require a tenant to pay a rent deposit with respect to a tenancy if the landlord does so on or before entering into the tenancy agreement. However, section 106(2) provides: | 10. Pursuant to section 106 of the RTA, a Landlord may require a tenant to pay a rent deposit with respect to a tenancy if the landlord does so on or before entering into the tenancy agreement. However, section 106(2) provides: | ||
::i. The amount of a rent deposit shall not be more than the lesser of the amount of rent for one rent period and the amount of rent for one month. | |||
11. In the case before me, the Landlord clearly collected more than a month’s rent. However, the Divisional Court has held that the collection of a prepayment of rent is only illegal where the prepayment is not voluntary. | 11. In the case before me, the Landlord clearly collected more than a month’s rent. However, the Divisional Court has held that the collection of a prepayment of rent is only illegal where the prepayment is not voluntary. | ||
12. In Royal Bank of Canada v. MacPherson [2009] O.J. No. 3806, where the Tenant voluntarily prepaid rent, the Divisional Court agreed with the Board’s finding that the tenant was entitled to credit for a bona fide prepayment of rent and could not be evicted by a mortgagee in possession. In so doing, the Court held | 12. In Royal Bank of Canada v. MacPherson [2009] O.J. No. 3806, where the Tenant voluntarily prepaid rent, the Divisional Court agreed with the Board’s finding that the tenant was entitled to credit for a bona fide prepayment of rent and could not be evicted by a mortgagee in possession. In so doing, the Court held | ||
::i. the plain language of these sections does not make pre-payment by a tenant of a rent in excess of one month's rent illegal. It makes the act of a landlord demanding such prepayment illegal. [at para.27] | |||
13. The approach was confirmed by the Divisional Court again in [http://canlii.ca/t/g3gpm Corvers v. Bumbia, 2014 ONSC 985 (CanLII)]. The question before me then is whether the prepayment of rent in this case was voluntary. | |||
13. The approach was confirmed by the Divisional Court again in Corvers v. Bumbia, 2014 ONSC 985 (CanLII). The question before me then is whether the prepayment of rent in this case was voluntary. | |||
Revision as of 00:26, 11 February 2020
SWT-01750-17 (Re), 2017 CanLII 51511 (ON LTB)
10. Pursuant to section 106 of the RTA, a Landlord may require a tenant to pay a rent deposit with respect to a tenancy if the landlord does so on or before entering into the tenancy agreement. However, section 106(2) provides:
- i. The amount of a rent deposit shall not be more than the lesser of the amount of rent for one rent period and the amount of rent for one month.
11. In the case before me, the Landlord clearly collected more than a month’s rent. However, the Divisional Court has held that the collection of a prepayment of rent is only illegal where the prepayment is not voluntary.
12. In Royal Bank of Canada v. MacPherson [2009] O.J. No. 3806, where the Tenant voluntarily prepaid rent, the Divisional Court agreed with the Board’s finding that the tenant was entitled to credit for a bona fide prepayment of rent and could not be evicted by a mortgagee in possession. In so doing, the Court held
- i. the plain language of these sections does not make pre-payment by a tenant of a rent in excess of one month's rent illegal. It makes the act of a landlord demanding such prepayment illegal. [at para.27]
13. The approach was confirmed by the Divisional Court again in Corvers v. Bumbia, 2014 ONSC 985 (CanLII). The question before me then is whether the prepayment of rent in this case was voluntary.
