Notice by Employer of Accident

Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997

21 (1) An employer shall notify the Board within three days after learning of an accident to a worker employed by him, her or it if the accident necessitates health care or results in the worker not being able to earn full wages.

(2) The notice must be on a form approved by the Board and the employer shall give the Board such other information as the Board may require from time to time in connection with the accident.

(3) An employer who fails to comply with this section shall pay the prescribed amount to the Board. This payment is in addition to any penalty imposed by a court for an offence under subsection 152 (3).

(4) The employer shall give a copy of the notice to the worker at the time the notice is given to the Board. 1997, c. 16, Sched. A, s. 21.

Decision No. 1600/17, 2017 ONWSIAT 1787 (CanLII)

[25] The question arising then is whether that event is an “accident” as defined in law and policy. Before I address that key question, however, a short, preliminary discussion whether the employer’s reporting obligations were engaged is required given that the workplace representatives addressed that issue before me.

[26] I find the answer to this preliminary question is straight-forward. Above referenced section 21 of the Act and OPM Document No. 15-01-02 in my view make clear that the employer’s reporting obligations were not engaged by what the worker purportedly told GM on April 8, 2011, and by what happened in the coming days/weeks/months. That is because:

• the worker lost no time from work,

• he did not seek medical attention (thus, no “health care” was sought),

• he did not require any modification for his duties for approximately 20 months following the claimed accident (thus, he earned his full wages),

• during that nearly 20 months following the claimed accident, the worker never contacted GM or anyone else about what he only subsequently, very much later, claimed were persistent left knee difficulties.

Accordingly, pursuant to the Act and policy, the employer had no obligation to report the claimed incident of which the worker informed GM. Simply, the legal threshold was not met.