Abandoned Rental Unit (RTA): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Line 9: Line 9:
==SWT-86973-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 44311 (ON LTB)==
==SWT-86973-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 44311 (ON LTB)==


12. The Courts have consistently held that a landlord’s reasonable belief that the tenant has abandoned the rental unit, however genuine, is not sufficient authority to recover possession under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act').  Pursuant to section 79 of the Act, a landlord may apply for an order from the Board determining that the tenant has in fact abandoned the rental unit.  The Landlord in the present case never sought such an order.  Given the Tenant’s uncontested evidence that he informed P.S. on February 22, 2016 that he intended to remain in his room and continue the tenancy, on the balance of probabilities, I do not find that P.S.’s purported belief that the Tenant had abandoned the rental unit was even reasonable.


<ref name="SWT-86973-16">SWT-86973-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 44311 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gsk4f>, retrieved on 2021-03-29</ref>
<ref name="SWT-86973-16">SWT-86973-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 44311 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gsk4f>, retrieved on 2021-03-29</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 00:04, 30 March 2021


Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17

79 If a landlord believes that a tenant has abandoned a rental unit, the landlord may apply to the Board for an order terminating the tenancy. 2006, c. 17, s. 79.

[1]

SWT-86973-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 44311 (ON LTB)

12. The Courts have consistently held that a landlord’s reasonable belief that the tenant has abandoned the rental unit, however genuine, is not sufficient authority to recover possession under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act'). Pursuant to section 79 of the Act, a landlord may apply for an order from the Board determining that the tenant has in fact abandoned the rental unit. The Landlord in the present case never sought such an order. Given the Tenant’s uncontested evidence that he informed P.S. on February 22, 2016 that he intended to remain in his room and continue the tenancy, on the balance of probabilities, I do not find that P.S.’s purported belief that the Tenant had abandoned the rental unit was even reasonable.

[2]

References

  1. Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06r17>, retrieved 2021-03-29
  2. SWT-86973-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 44311 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gsk4f>, retrieved on 2021-03-29