Category:OCF-1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Accident Benefits") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Accident Benefits]] | [[Category:Accident Benefits]] | ||
==Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT)<ref name="Canavan"/>== | |||
[1] The applicant. was involved in motor vehicle accident on January 27, 2014. The applicant states that as a result of this accident he sustained serious physical and psychological injuries. | |||
[2] The applicant did not submit his application for accident benefits (OCF-1) to the respondent, Unifund, until more than 2 years had passed. The parties have differing views on the exact date of the submission of the OCF-1 however, both parties agree that it was more than 2 years following the accident. | |||
[3] There is no dispute between the parties that the applicant submitted his OCF-1 outside of the prescribed timelines in section 32 of the Schedule[1]. <b><u>Instead, the preliminary issue before the Tribunal is whether he has a reasonable explanation for that delay that would permit him to proceed with his application for accident benefits.</b></u> | |||
<ref name="Canavan">Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT), <https://canlii.ca/t/jdpxq>, retrieved on 2021-04-26</ref> | |||
Revision as of 19:21, 26 April 2021
[1] The applicant. was involved in motor vehicle accident on January 27, 2014. The applicant states that as a result of this accident he sustained serious physical and psychological injuries.
[2] The applicant did not submit his application for accident benefits (OCF-1) to the respondent, Unifund, until more than 2 years had passed. The parties have differing views on the exact date of the submission of the OCF-1 however, both parties agree that it was more than 2 years following the accident.
[3] There is no dispute between the parties that the applicant submitted his OCF-1 outside of the prescribed timelines in section 32 of the Schedule[1]. Instead, the preliminary issue before the Tribunal is whether he has a reasonable explanation for that delay that would permit him to proceed with his application for accident benefits.
Pages in category "OCF-1"
This category contains only the following page.
