Cost of an Animal In-Care (AWS): Difference between revisions
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<ref name="OREG44719">O. Reg. 447/19: MINISTERIAL PRESCRIPTIONS, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/190447>, retrieved 2022-02-20</ref> | <ref name="OREG44719">O. Reg. 447/19: MINISTERIAL PRESCRIPTIONS, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/190447>, retrieved 2022-02-20</ref> | ||
==St-Jacques v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, 2022 ONACRB 2 (CanLII)<ref name="St-Jacques"/>== | |||
[18] During his testimony, the appellant stated that he does not believe that a boarding fee of $33.05 per day is reasonable. When probed on why he thought it was not reasonable, he stated that it was because the dog should not have been taken from him in the first place. I understand this to be not an opinion on cost but based rather on his continuing view that the dog was not in distress. | |||
<ref name="St-Jacques">St-Jacques v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, 2022 ONACRB 2 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jlrvb>, retrieved on 2022-02-20</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 02:24, 21 February 2022
Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
---|---|
Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-23 |
CLNP Page ID: | 1872 |
Page Categories: | [Animal Control (POA)] |
Citation: | Cost of an Animal In-Care (AWS), CLNP 1872, <6P>, retrieved on 2024-11-23 |
Editor: | Sharvey |
Last Updated: | 2022/02/21 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act, 2019, S.O. 2019, c. 13[1]
35 (1) If an animal welfare inspector has provided an animal with necessaries to relieve its distress or the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector has taken an animal into the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector’s care, the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector may, from time to time, serve on the owner or custodian of the animal a statement of account respecting the cost of the necessaries.
- (2) The statement of account must have printed or written on it the content of subsections 38 (2) and (5).
- (3) An owner or custodian who receives a statement of account under subsection (1) is, subject to an order made under subsection 38 (9), liable for the amount specified in the statement.
- (4) Subject to any agreement made under subsection (5), the animal is forfeited to the Crown if,
- (a) the owner or custodian does not appeal the statement of account in accordance with subsection 38 (2) and fails to pay the stated amount within a prescribed period of time after receiving the statement of account; or
- (b) the owner or custodian appealed the statement of account in accordance with subsection 38 (2) but failed to pay the confirmed or varied amount within a prescribed period of time after the Board provided notice of its decision.
- (5) Before the expiry of the relevant time period set out in clause (4) (a) or (b), the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector may enter into a written agreement with the owner or custodian to extend the time for payment or reduce the amount that is to be paid, or both.
- ...
38 (1) An owner or custodian of an animal may appeal the following to the Board within five business days after receiving notice of them:
- 1. An order from an animal welfare inspector.
- 2. A decision by an animal welfare inspector to remove an animal from a place.
- 3. A decision to take an animal into the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector’s care.
- (2) An owner or custodian of an animal who is served with a statement of account may apply to the Board by notice in writing to appeal the statement of account within the prescribed period after being served the statement.
O. Reg. 447/19: MINISTERIAL PRESCRIPTIONS[2]
3. For the purposes of subsection 38 (2) of the Act, five business days is the prescribed period of time for applying to the Board.
St-Jacques v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, 2022 ONACRB 2 (CanLII)[3]
[18] During his testimony, the appellant stated that he does not believe that a boarding fee of $33.05 per day is reasonable. When probed on why he thought it was not reasonable, he stated that it was because the dog should not have been taken from him in the first place. I understand this to be not an opinion on cost but based rather on his continuing view that the dog was not in distress.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act, 2019, S.O. 2019, c. 13, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/19p13#BK73>, retrieved 2022-02-20
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 O. Reg. 447/19: MINISTERIAL PRESCRIPTIONS, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/190447>, retrieved 2022-02-20
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 St-Jacques v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, 2022 ONACRB 2 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jlrvb>, retrieved on 2022-02-20