N12 Affidavit Requirements: Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Line 18: Line 18:
==Nanko B.V. Holdings Inc. v Babasola, 2021 CanLII 139854 (ON LTB)==
==Nanko B.V. Holdings Inc. v Babasola, 2021 CanLII 139854 (ON LTB)==


4. The first reason why this application must be dismissed is because the affidavit filed by the Landlord does not provide all of the information required by paragraph 72(1)(b) of the Act. In particular, to meet the requirements, the affidavit must certify that the purchaser requires “the rental unit” for his or her own personal use. The affidavit proffered by the Landlord does not provide this information.


:...





Revision as of 02:45, 11 July 2022


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-11-27
CLNP Page ID: 1955
Page Categories: N12 Affidavit Requirements
Citation: N12 Affidavit Requirements, CLNP 1955, <r/7q>, retrieved on 2024-11-27
Editor: P08916
Last Updated: 2022/07/11

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076

Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today


Residential Tenancies Act, 2006[1]

72 (1) The Board shall not make an order terminating a tenancy and evicting the tenant in an application under section 69 based on,

(a) a notice of termination given under section 48 on or after the day section 13 of the Rental Fairness Act, 2017 comes into force, unless the landlord has filed with the Board an affidavit sworn by the person who personally requires the rental unit certifying that the person in good faith requires the rental unit for his or her own personal use for a period of at least one year; or
(b) a notice of termination under section 49, unless the landlord has filed with the Board an affidavit sworn by the person who personally requires the rental unit certifying that the person in good faith requires the rental unit for his or her own personal use. 2017, c. 13, s. 13.

[1]

Nanko B.V. Holdings Inc. v Babasola, 2021 CanLII 139854 (ON LTB)

4. The first reason why this application must be dismissed is because the affidavit filed by the Landlord does not provide all of the information required by paragraph 72(1)(b) of the Act. In particular, to meet the requirements, the affidavit must certify that the purchaser requires “the rental unit” for his or her own personal use. The affidavit proffered by the Landlord does not provide this information.

...


[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06r17#BK68>, reterived 2021-03-16
  2. Nanko B.V. Holdings Inc. v Babasola, 2021 CanLII 139854 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/jltph>, retrieved on 2022-07-10