License to Occupy v. Lease Agreement (Commercial): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (Commercial Tenancy)]]
[[Category:Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (Commercial Tenancy)]]
==Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)<ref name="Campbell"/>==
[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.[6] I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease.
<ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref>

Revision as of 18:51, 27 July 2022


Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)[1]

[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.[6] I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease.


[1]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27