License to Occupy v. Lease Agreement (Commercial): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)<ref name="Campbell"/>== | ==Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)<ref name="Campbell"/>== | ||
[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant. | [11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.<ref name="Stoneridge"/> I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease. | ||
<ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | <ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | ||
<ref name="Stoneridge">Stoneridge Travel Centre Inc. v. 1079334 Ontario Ltd., 2000 CanLII 27013 (ON CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/234fn>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 27 July 2022
Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)[1]
[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.[2] I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Stoneridge Travel Centre Inc. v. 1079334 Ontario Ltd., 2000 CanLII 27013 (ON CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/234fn>, retrieved on 2022-07-27
