Hostile Witness Rule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. v Rancourt, 2018 CanLII 72583 (ON LRB)<ref name="Rancourt"/>== | ==Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. v Rancourt, 2018 CanLII 72583 (ON LRB)<ref name="Rancourt"/>== | ||
13. | 13. Ontario’s Divisional Court has confirmed an employer can call the grievor as its own witness in a labour arbitration: ''Canada Post Corporation v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers'', (1991), 1991 CanLII 13501 (CA LA), 21 L.A.C. (4<sup>th</sup>) 350 (''CPC''), rev’d Ont. Div. Crt., November 12, 1991. The Divisional Court’s decision is unreported, but extracts from its decision overturning an arbitrator’s refusal to allow Canada Post to call the grievor as its own witness have been quoted in various arbitral awards[1]: | ||
::<i>Generally speaking, although the arbitrator is and remains the master of the procedure to be followed, each party should be free to call whatever evidence and in whatever sequence it chooses. Canada Post sought to exercise that right. It proposed to proceed in a somewhat unusual way, but one which, in the circumstances was entirely understandable and justifiable. It is also a right which has been legitimated by the court. ''Bourdouhxe'' v. ''Institut Albert-Prevost'' (1974), 77 C.L.L.S.C. 14, 212 (Que. C.A.). The arbitrator's order denies Canada Post's right to proceed in that fashion.</i> | ::<i>Generally speaking, although the arbitrator is and remains the master of the procedure to be followed, each party should be free to call whatever evidence and in whatever sequence it chooses. Canada Post sought to exercise that right. It proposed to proceed in a somewhat unusual way, but one which, in the circumstances was entirely understandable and justifiable. It is also a right which has been legitimated by the court. ''Bourdouhxe'' v. ''Institut Albert-Prevost'' (1974), 77 C.L.L.S.C. 14, 212 (Que. C.A.). The arbitrator's order denies Canada Post's right to proceed in that fashion.</i> | ||
Revision as of 02:10, 28 March 2024
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-23 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2362 |
| Page Categories: | |
| Citation: | Hostile Witness Rule, CLNP 2362, <>, retrieved on 2024-11-23 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2024/03/28 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. v Rancourt, 2018 CanLII 72583 (ON LRB)[1]
13. Ontario’s Divisional Court has confirmed an employer can call the grievor as its own witness in a labour arbitration: Canada Post Corporation v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers, (1991), 1991 CanLII 13501 (CA LA), 21 L.A.C. (4th) 350 (CPC), rev’d Ont. Div. Crt., November 12, 1991. The Divisional Court’s decision is unreported, but extracts from its decision overturning an arbitrator’s refusal to allow Canada Post to call the grievor as its own witness have been quoted in various arbitral awards[1]:
- Generally speaking, although the arbitrator is and remains the master of the procedure to be followed, each party should be free to call whatever evidence and in whatever sequence it chooses. Canada Post sought to exercise that right. It proposed to proceed in a somewhat unusual way, but one which, in the circumstances was entirely understandable and justifiable. It is also a right which has been legitimated by the court. Bourdouhxe v. Institut Albert-Prevost (1974), 77 C.L.L.S.C. 14, 212 (Que. C.A.). The arbitrator's order denies Canada Post's right to proceed in that fashion.
...
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. v Rancourt, 2018 CanLII 72583 (ON LRB), <https://canlii.ca/t/htbt1>, retrieved on 2024-03-27
