Due Diligence (Exercise of): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Hearing Process (LTB) {{Citation: | categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | shortlink = }} ==Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV)== <ref name="Reid">Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV), <File:LTB-T-056551-22 RV.pdf, https://rvt.link/fo>, retrieved 2025-06-05</ref>") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Citation: | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | | categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | ||
| shortlink = | | shortlink = https://rvt.link/fp | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV)== | ==Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV)== | ||
5. The Landlord claims she did not receive the notice by mail as that is not the correct address. The Landlord acknowledge receiving the notice of hearing by e-mail; however, it went to her junk mail folder. She did not check her junk mail folder until after the hearing. | |||
6. In Q Res IV Operating GP Inc. v. Berezovs’ka, 2017 ONSC 5541 (Div. Ct.) (CanLII), the Divisional Court affirmed that a party to a Board proceeding must exercise appropriate diligence to be aware of and to attend a Board proceeding. In this case, I find the Landlord’s lack of diligence to be the reason why she did not receive the notice of hearing. | |||
<ref name="Reid">Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV), <[[File:LTB-T-056551-22 RV.pdf]], https://rvt.link/fo>, retrieved 2025-06-05</ref> | <ref name="Reid">Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV), <[[File:LTB-T-056551-22 RV.pdf]], https://rvt.link/fo>, retrieved 2025-06-05</ref> | ||
==References== | |||
Revision as of 15:04, 5 June 2025
| 🥷 Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2025 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2025-06-07 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2507 |
| Page Categories: | [Hearing Process (LTB)] |
| Citation: | Due Diligence (Exercise of), CLNP 2507, <https://rvt.link/fp>, retrieved on 2025-06-07 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2025/06/05 |
Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV)
5. The Landlord claims she did not receive the notice by mail as that is not the correct address. The Landlord acknowledge receiving the notice of hearing by e-mail; however, it went to her junk mail folder. She did not check her junk mail folder until after the hearing.
6. In Q Res IV Operating GP Inc. v. Berezovs’ka, 2017 ONSC 5541 (Div. Ct.) (CanLII), the Divisional Court affirmed that a party to a Board proceeding must exercise appropriate diligence to be aware of and to attend a Board proceeding. In this case, I find the Landlord’s lack of diligence to be the reason why she did not receive the notice of hearing.
References
- ↑ Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV), <File:LTB-T-056551-22 RV.pdf, https://rvt.link/fo>, retrieved 2025-06-05
