False Light (Tort - Privacy): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/j4gqn Yenovkian v. Gulian, 2019 ONSC 7279 (CanLII)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/j4gqn Yenovkian v. Gulian, 2019 ONSC 7279 (CanLII)]== | ||
[164] The test for intentional infliction of mental suffering as set out by the Court of Appeal in Piresferreira v. Ayotte, 2010 ONCA 384, para. 27 is: | |||
::(a) flagrant or outrageous conduct; | |||
::(b) calculated to produce harm; and | |||
::(c) resulting in a visible and provable illness. | |||
[165] I find that Mr. Yenovkian’s conduct was calculated to produce the kind of harm suffered by Ms. Gulian, or he knew that it was substantially certain to follow: Piresferreira v Ayotte, 2010 ONCA 384 at para 78. | |||
Revision as of 22:45, 8 March 2020
Yenovkian v. Gulian, 2019 ONSC 7279 (CanLII)
[164] The test for intentional infliction of mental suffering as set out by the Court of Appeal in Piresferreira v. Ayotte, 2010 ONCA 384, para. 27 is:
- (a) flagrant or outrageous conduct;
- (b) calculated to produce harm; and
- (c) resulting in a visible and provable illness.
[165] I find that Mr. Yenovkian’s conduct was calculated to produce the kind of harm suffered by Ms. Gulian, or he knew that it was substantially certain to follow: Piresferreira v Ayotte, 2010 ONCA 384 at para 78.
