Admission of Evidence at Trial: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Tag: Replaced |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[[Expert Reports]] | *[[Expert Reports]] | ||
*[[Browne v. Dunn - Impeach the Witness’s Credibility]] | *[[Browne v. Dunn - Impeach the Witness’s Credibility]] | ||
*[[Rule 18.02 - Exception to Hearsay Evidence]] | |||
==Production Order for Documents in Small Claims Court== | ==Production Order for Documents in Small Claims Court== | ||
Revision as of 21:32, 14 December 2019
General Evidence Rules
- Parole Evidence Rule
- Expert Reports
- Browne v. Dunn - Impeach the Witness’s Credibility
- Rule 18.02 - Exception to Hearsay Evidence
Production Order for Documents in Small Claims Court
See: Order for Production
Hearsay Evidence
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Wiedemann, 2019 CanLII 10131 (ON SCSM)
8. Hearsay may be admitted in Small Claims Court but is generally entitled to reduced weight because it is hearsay and therefore less reliable than direct evidence: Central Burner Service Inc. v. Texaco Canada Inc. (1989), 36 O.A.C. 239 (Div. Ct.).
