Non-Possessory Lien (RSLA): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Repair Storage & Liens ==[http://canlii.ca/t/glrl4 Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)]==") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/glrl4 Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/glrl4 Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)]== | ||
[1] The appellant, Kevin Connolly, appeals from the judgment of Douglas J. which declared that the respondent, Advantagewon Inc., was entitled to a non-possessory lien under Part II of the Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. R. 25 (“RSLA”), in respect of the appellant’s 2011 Nissan Titan (the “Vehicle”). | |||
Revision as of 23:02, 18 May 2020
Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)
[1] The appellant, Kevin Connolly, appeals from the judgment of Douglas J. which declared that the respondent, Advantagewon Inc., was entitled to a non-possessory lien under Part II of the Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. R. 25 (“RSLA”), in respect of the appellant’s 2011 Nissan Titan (the “Vehicle”).
