Indemnity: Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Tort Law Category:Small Claims Category:Legal Principles ==[http://canlii.ca/t/1w0st Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)]== [19] However t...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Small Claims]] | [[Category:Small Claims]] | ||
[[Category:Legal Principles]] | [[Category:Legal Principles]] | ||
[[Category:Definitions (Re: Legal Usage)]] | |||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/1w0st Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/1w0st Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)]== |
Revision as of 15:35, 2 May 2021
Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)
[19] However the phrase "indemnify and save harmless" is retrospective not prospective. Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed.) defines "indemnity" as:
- A duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another. 2. the right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such duty. 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)
[20] The phrase "indemnity clause" in that publication is equated to "hold harmless clause", making the second half of the phrase in clause 2.11 of the contract superfluous.