Relief From Forfeiture (Commercial Tenancy): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
m (Replaced content with "Category:Eviction (Commercial Tenancy)")
Tag: Replaced
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Eviction (Commercial Tenancy)]]
[[Category:Eviction (Commercial Tenancy)]]
==1497777 Ontario Inc. v. Leon's Furniture Ltd, 2003 CanLII 50106 (ON CA)<ref name="Leon's"/>==
[50] Finally, with respect to what may be considered to be the legal framework relating to this issue, I note that it has been held that an option to renew a lease, when exercised, results in a fresh demise relating to a new term: see <b><i>Avlor Investments Ltd. v. J.K. Children's Wear Inc. (1991), 1991 CanLII 7124 (ON SC), 6 O.R. (3d) 225, 85 D.L.R. (4th) 239 (Gen. Div.)</b></i><ref name="Avlor"/>, at p. 231 O.R. <b><u>"Where a lease contains an option to renew the lease the exercise of the option will ordinarily involve the creation of a new lease, . . ."</b></u>: [page220] Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th ed (London: Butterworths, 1981), vol. 27(1), para. 467, at p. 435. This supports the view that "the term" in the consent was the initial 30-year term in the lease and that the renewal terms would be new terms.
<ref name="Leon's">1497777 Ontario Inc. v. Leon's Furniture Ltd, 2003 CanLII 50106 (ON CA), <http://canlii.ca/t/1gmfr>, retrieved on 2020-06-25</ref>
<ref name="Avlor">Avlor Investments Ltd. v. J.K. Children's Wear Inc., 1991 CanLII 7124 (ON SC), <http://canlii.ca/t/g1fxf>, retrieved on 2020-06-25</ref>
==References==

Revision as of 01:16, 26 June 2020