Irreparable Harm - Re Meaning of: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Legal Principles ==Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)<ref name="Wong"/>== [32] Second, I am satisfied that the mo...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)<ref name="Wong"/>== | ==Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)<ref name="Wong"/>== | ||
[32] Second, I am satisfied that the moving party has demonstrated that irreparable harm will result if the injunction is not granted. Irreparable harm may include the increased risk of personal injury or assault: see Ivaco Rolling Mills (2004) LP v. LeBlanc, (2005), 144 A.C.W.S. (3d) 82 at paras. 22-24. <b><u>Irreparable harm also includes psychological harm that is more than transient or trifling:</b></u> see <i>Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 747 v. Korolekh, (2010) 2010 ONSC 4448 (CanLII), 322 D.l.R. (4th) 443 at para. 71.</i><ref name="Korolekh"/> | [32] Second, I am satisfied that the moving party has demonstrated that irreparable harm will result if the injunction is not granted. <b><u>Irreparable harm may include the increased risk of personal injury or assault:</b></u> see Ivaco Rolling Mills (2004) LP v. LeBlanc, (2005), 144 A.C.W.S. (3d) 82 at paras. 22-24. <b><u>Irreparable harm also includes psychological harm that is more than transient or trifling:</b></u> see <i>Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 747 v. Korolekh, (2010) 2010 ONSC 4448 (CanLII), 322 D.l.R. (4th) 443 at para. 71.</i><ref name="Korolekh"/> | ||
<ref name="Wong">Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gwn72>, retrieved on 2020-12-21</ref> | <ref name="Wong">Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gwn72>, retrieved on 2020-12-21</ref> | ||
Revision as of 19:22, 22 December 2020
Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)[1]
[32] Second, I am satisfied that the moving party has demonstrated that irreparable harm will result if the injunction is not granted. Irreparable harm may include the increased risk of personal injury or assault: see Ivaco Rolling Mills (2004) LP v. LeBlanc, (2005), 144 A.C.W.S. (3d) 82 at paras. 22-24. Irreparable harm also includes psychological harm that is more than transient or trifling: see Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 747 v. Korolekh, (2010) 2010 ONSC 4448 (CanLII), 322 D.l.R. (4th) 443 at para. 71.[2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gwn72>, retrieved on 2020-12-21
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 747 v. Korolekh, 2010 ONSC 4448 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/2c41n>, retrieved on 2020-12-21
- ↑ RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 SCR 311, <http://canlii.ca/t/1frtw>, retrieved on 2020-12-21
