Irreparable Harm - Re Meaning of: Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Legal Principles]] | [[Category:Legal Principles]] | ||
[[Category:Definitions (Re: Legal Usage)]] | |||
==Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)<ref name="Wong"/>== | ==Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)<ref name="Wong"/>== | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 2 May 2021
Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII)[1]
[32] Second, I am satisfied that the moving party has demonstrated that irreparable harm will result if the injunction is not granted. Irreparable harm may include the increased risk of personal injury or assault: see Ivaco Rolling Mills (2004) LP v. LeBlanc, (2005), 144 A.C.W.S. (3d) 82 at paras. 22-24. Irreparable harm also includes psychological harm that is more than transient or trifling: see Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 747 v. Korolekh, (2010) 2010 ONSC 4448 (CanLII), 322 D.l.R. (4th) 443 at para. 71.[2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2395 v Wong, 2016 ONSC 8000 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gwn72>, retrieved on 2020-12-21
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 747 v. Korolekh, 2010 ONSC 4448 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/2c41n>, retrieved on 2020-12-21
- ↑ RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 SCR 311, <http://canlii.ca/t/1frtw>, retrieved on 2020-12-21
