Indemnity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Tort Law Category:Small Claims Category:Legal Principles ==[http://canlii.ca/t/1w0st Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)]== [19] However t...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Small Claims]] | [[Category:Small Claims]] | ||
[[Category:Legal Principles]] | [[Category:Legal Principles]] | ||
[[Category:Definitions (Re: Legal Usage)]] | |||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/1w0st Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/1w0st Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)]== | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 2 May 2021
Lappin v. Barrie (City), 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)
[19] However the phrase "indemnify and save harmless" is retrospective not prospective. Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed.) defines "indemnity" as:
- A duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another. 2. the right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such duty. 2008 CanLII 9373 (ON SC)
[20] The phrase "indemnity clause" in that publication is equated to "hold harmless clause", making the second half of the phrase in clause 2.11 of the contract superfluous.
