Use of Video and Photo Evidence: Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA)<ref name="Creemer"/>== | ==Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA)<ref name="Creemer"/>== | ||
Page 22 | |||
:... | |||
All the cases dealing with the admissibility of photographs go to show that such admissibility depends on (1) their accuracy in truly representing the facts; (2) their fairness and absence of any intention to mislead; (3) their verification on oath by a person capable to do so. (...) | |||
<ref name="Creemer">Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/hv151>, retrieved on 2021-12-13</ref> | <ref name="Creemer">Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/hv151>, retrieved on 2021-12-13</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:38, 13 December 2021
| 🥷 Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2025 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2025-04-19 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 1828 |
| Page Categories: | [Evidence Law] |
| Citation: | Use of Video and Photo Evidence, CLNP 1828, <59>, retrieved on 2025-04-19 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2021/12/13 |
Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA)[1]
Page 22
- ...
All the cases dealing with the admissibility of photographs go to show that such admissibility depends on (1) their accuracy in truly representing the facts; (2) their fairness and absence of any intention to mislead; (3) their verification on oath by a person capable to do so. (...)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/hv151>, retrieved on 2021-12-13
