Use of Video and Photo Evidence: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA)<ref name="Creemer"/>== | ==Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA)<ref name="Creemer"/>== | ||
Page 22 | |||
:... | |||
All the cases dealing with the admissibility of photographs go to show that such admissibility depends on (1) their accuracy in truly representing the facts; (2) their fairness and absence of any intention to mislead; (3) their verification on oath by a person capable to do so. (...) | |||
<ref name="Creemer">Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/hv151>, retrieved on 2021-12-13</ref> | <ref name="Creemer">Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/hv151>, retrieved on 2021-12-13</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:38, 13 December 2021
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-26 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 1828 |
| Page Categories: | [Evidence Law] |
| Citation: | Use of Video and Photo Evidence, CLNP 1828, <59>, retrieved on 2024-11-26 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2021/12/13 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA)[1]
Page 22
- ...
All the cases dealing with the admissibility of photographs go to show that such admissibility depends on (1) their accuracy in truly representing the facts; (2) their fairness and absence of any intention to mislead; (3) their verification on oath by a person capable to do so. (...)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Regina v. Creemer and Cormier, 1967 CanLII 711 (NS CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/hv151>, retrieved on 2021-12-13
