Unilaterally Altering Contracts: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Citation: | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = [Legal Principles] | | categories = [Legal Principles] | ||
| shortlink = | | shortlink = 5n | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 18 January 2022
| 🥷 Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2025 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2025-04-03 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 1850 |
| Page Categories: | [Legal Principles] |
| Citation: | Unilaterally Altering Contracts, CLNP 1850, <5n>, retrieved on 2025-04-03 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2022/01/18 |
Kritz v City of Guelph, 2016 ONSC 6783 (CanLII)[1]
[53] With respect to the City’s argument that certain rights of tenants under the RTA (including security of tenure) are “conferred upon tenants individually and cannot be displaced or circumvented by a group lease” and “while a group may commence a tenancy together, they [i.e. each member of the group] retain individual rights under the RTA and the landlord must deal with each tenant as an individual”, Mr. Kritz points out a recent decision of the Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board, as reflected in D.S. v. R.T., SOT-68533-16-RV, 2016 CanLII 44359 (Ont. L.T.B.)[2], at paras. 6-10. There, the Board upheld an earlier decision that had determined that one tenant could unilaterally terminate a joint tenancy without the consent (or even the knowledge) of his/her co-tenant.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Kritz v City of Guelph, 2016 ONSC 6783 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/h3cn4>, retrieved on 2021-04-01
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 SOT-68533-16-RV (Re), 2016 CanLII 44359 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gsk2p>, retrieved on 2021-04-01
