License to Occupy v. Lease Agreement (Commercial): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | <ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | ||
==References== | |||
Revision as of 18:51, 27 July 2022
Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)[1]
[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.[6] I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27
