Minor Child - Right to Contract: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Johnstone v. Hepditch Jr., 2018 NBQB 100 (CanLII)<ref name="Johnstone"/>== | ==Johnstone v. Hepditch Jr., 2018 NBQB 100 (CanLII)<ref name="Johnstone"/>== | ||
[11] In <i>Bayview Credit Union Ltd. v. Daigle (1983) 1983 CanLII 2923 (NB KB), 3 D.L.R. (4th) 95; 1983 CanLII 2923</i><ref name="Daigle"/>, Higgins J. commented on the classification of contracts involving minors at paragraph 5: | |||
::Contracts involving minors may generally be classified into four main classes as follows: | |||
:::1. enforceable contracts for necessities; | |||
:::2. voidable contracts which the infant must repudiate during minority or within a reasonable time thereafter; | |||
:::3. voidable contracts which are not binding unless and until ratified after attaining majority; and | |||
:::4. contracts which are absolutely void. | |||
:::See Chitty on Contracts, 24th ed. (1977), pp. 220-1, paras. 473-4. | |||
| Line 15: | Line 23: | ||
<ref name="Johnstone">Johnstone v. Hepditch Jr., 2018 NBQB 100 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hscgp>, retrieved on 2023-09-21</ref> | <ref name="Johnstone">Johnstone v. Hepditch Jr., 2018 NBQB 100 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hscgp>, retrieved on 2023-09-21</ref> | ||
<ref name="Daigle">Bayview Credit Union Ltd. v. Daigle, 1983 CanLII 2923 (NB KB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gb5g0>, retrieved on 2023-09-21</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 21:48, 21 September 2023
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-22 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2279 |
| Page Categories: | Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (LTB), Contract Law |
| Citation: | Minor Child - Right to Contract, CLNP 2279, <https://rvt.link/8p>, retrieved on 2024-11-22 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2023/09/21 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
Johnstone v. Hepditch Jr., 2018 NBQB 100 (CanLII)[1]
[11] In Bayview Credit Union Ltd. v. Daigle (1983) 1983 CanLII 2923 (NB KB), 3 D.L.R. (4th) 95; 1983 CanLII 2923[2], Higgins J. commented on the classification of contracts involving minors at paragraph 5:
- Contracts involving minors may generally be classified into four main classes as follows:
- 1. enforceable contracts for necessities;
- 2. voidable contracts which the infant must repudiate during minority or within a reasonable time thereafter;
- 3. voidable contracts which are not binding unless and until ratified after attaining majority; and
- 4. contracts which are absolutely void.
- See Chitty on Contracts, 24th ed. (1977), pp. 220-1, paras. 473-4.
- Contracts involving minors may generally be classified into four main classes as follows:
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Johnstone v. Hepditch Jr., 2018 NBQB 100 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hscgp>, retrieved on 2023-09-21
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Bayview Credit Union Ltd. v. Daigle, 1983 CanLII 2923 (NB KB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gb5g0>, retrieved on 2023-09-21
