Criminal Negligence Causing Death (Sentencing): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<ref name="CC">Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), <https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-34.html>, retrieved 2023-11-06</ref> | <ref name="CC">Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), <https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-34.html>, retrieved 2023-11-06</ref> | ||
==R. v. Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), [2000] 2 SCR 90<ref name="MorriseySCC"/>== | |||
The accused was drinking with his friend T and T’s father at an isolated camp in the woods, where the accused also began taking prescription drugs. The accused and T successfully cut off a length of a rifle barrel. While T remained at the camp, the accused drove T’s father home. Upon returning to the camp, the accused found T lying in the top bunk in the cabin. While holding the rifle, which he knew to be loaded, he jumped up to the lower bunk in order to shake T — either to awaken him, or to get his attention. The accused lost his footing, and fell. The gun discharged, and the bullet struck T in the head, killing him instantly. The gun was not susceptible to shock discharge. There was no evidence that the accused intended to aim the gun at T. The accused pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death, contrary to s. 220(a) of the Criminal Code, and unlawfully pointing a firearm contrary to s. 86(1). He had spent five months in pre‑trial custody. The trial judge found that the four‑year minimum sentence provided for in s. 220(a) violated s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and sentenced the accused to two years’ imprisonment for the criminal negligence charge (taking into account pre‑trial custody) plus one year for the s. 86(1) charge. The trial judge was directed by the Court of Appeal to rehear the matter, as the Attorney General of Canada had not been given notice of the constitutional challenge. Having heard additional arguments, he maintained his original ruling. The Court of Appeal allowed the Crown’s appeal, and imposed a four‑year sentence for the criminal negligence charge, without any credit for pre‑trial custody. | |||
Held: The appeal should be dismissed in all respects except one. The accused’s sentence should be adjusted to take pre‑trial custody into account. | |||
... | |||
Per McLachlin and Arbour JJ.: The four‑year minimum sentence provided for in s. 220(a) of the Criminal Code is not so excessive or grossly disproportionate as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment for this offender in the particular circumstances of this case. Because the offence of criminal negligence causing death with a firearm is so fact‑driven, however, it cannot be concluded that the four‑year minimum sentence is not grossly disproportionate for “any” reasonable hypothetical offender. It is impossible to canvass, with the requisite richness of factual details, the many varied circumstances in which a charge of manslaughter could arise, even when the factual scenarios are restricted to manslaughter by criminal negligence, and involving the use of a firearm. Furthermore, real cases, representing situations that have arisen, must be seen as reasonable hypotheticals for purposes of a s. 12 analysis, no matter how unusual they may appear. | |||
<ref name="MorriseySCC">R. v. Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), [2000] 2 SCR 90, <https://canlii.ca/t/525j>, retrieved on 2023-11-06</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 02:40, 7 November 2023
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-26 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2299 |
| Page Categories: | Criminal Law |
| Citation: | Criminal Negligence Causing Death (Sentencing), CLNP 2299, <https://rvt.link/9j>, retrieved on 2024-11-26 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2023/11/07 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)
220 Every person who by criminal negligence causes death to another person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
- (a) where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years; and
- (b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life.
R. v. Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), [2000] 2 SCR 90[2]
The accused was drinking with his friend T and T’s father at an isolated camp in the woods, where the accused also began taking prescription drugs. The accused and T successfully cut off a length of a rifle barrel. While T remained at the camp, the accused drove T’s father home. Upon returning to the camp, the accused found T lying in the top bunk in the cabin. While holding the rifle, which he knew to be loaded, he jumped up to the lower bunk in order to shake T — either to awaken him, or to get his attention. The accused lost his footing, and fell. The gun discharged, and the bullet struck T in the head, killing him instantly. The gun was not susceptible to shock discharge. There was no evidence that the accused intended to aim the gun at T. The accused pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death, contrary to s. 220(a) of the Criminal Code, and unlawfully pointing a firearm contrary to s. 86(1). He had spent five months in pre‑trial custody. The trial judge found that the four‑year minimum sentence provided for in s. 220(a) violated s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and sentenced the accused to two years’ imprisonment for the criminal negligence charge (taking into account pre‑trial custody) plus one year for the s. 86(1) charge. The trial judge was directed by the Court of Appeal to rehear the matter, as the Attorney General of Canada had not been given notice of the constitutional challenge. Having heard additional arguments, he maintained his original ruling. The Court of Appeal allowed the Crown’s appeal, and imposed a four‑year sentence for the criminal negligence charge, without any credit for pre‑trial custody.
Held: The appeal should be dismissed in all respects except one. The accused’s sentence should be adjusted to take pre‑trial custody into account.
...
Per McLachlin and Arbour JJ.: The four‑year minimum sentence provided for in s. 220(a) of the Criminal Code is not so excessive or grossly disproportionate as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment for this offender in the particular circumstances of this case. Because the offence of criminal negligence causing death with a firearm is so fact‑driven, however, it cannot be concluded that the four‑year minimum sentence is not grossly disproportionate for “any” reasonable hypothetical offender. It is impossible to canvass, with the requisite richness of factual details, the many varied circumstances in which a charge of manslaughter could arise, even when the factual scenarios are restricted to manslaughter by criminal negligence, and involving the use of a firearm. Furthermore, real cases, representing situations that have arisen, must be seen as reasonable hypotheticals for purposes of a s. 12 analysis, no matter how unusual they may appear.
References
- ↑ Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), <https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-34.html>, retrieved 2023-11-06
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 R. v. Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), [2000] 2 SCR 90, <https://canlii.ca/t/525j>, retrieved on 2023-11-06
