Mitigating Losses - Rent (LTB): Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
13. I was not referred to, but have considered [https://caselaw.ninja/img_auth.php/8/8b/Yonge_Pleasant_Holdings_Ltd_v_Dragonov.pdf Yonge Pleasant Holdings Ltd. v. Dragonov (1995), 1995 CarswellOnt 2946 (O.C.G.D.)]. Mr. Justice Gibson in that case distinguished Lees and held that where the landlord gives notice to terminate a month to month tenancy the landlord cannot claim damages for loss of rent after the date of termination. | 13. I was not referred to, but have considered [https://caselaw.ninja/img_auth.php/8/8b/Yonge_Pleasant_Holdings_Ltd_v_Dragonov.pdf Yonge Pleasant Holdings Ltd. v. Dragonov (1995), 1995 CarswellOnt 2946 (O.C.G.D.)]. Mr. Justice Gibson in that case distinguished Lees and held that where the landlord gives notice to terminate a month to month tenancy the landlord cannot claim damages for loss of rent after the date of termination. | ||
18. Section 15 of the Residential Tenancies Act, supra, on the other hand, abolishes acceleration clauses altogether. The right of a landlord to both terminate the tenancy for fundamental breach by the tenant and claim loss of future rent otherwise due under the contract is, in effect, an acceleration of the rent due over the life of the contract, since the landlord may give notice and bring the claim before the period of the tenancy has expired. Accelerated rent clauses are void under the new Act. This alone is a reason to find against the plaintiff on this issue. | 18. Section 15 of the [https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06r17#BK180 Residential Tenancies Act], supra, on the other hand, abolishes acceleration clauses altogether. The right of a landlord to both terminate the tenancy for fundamental breach by the tenant and claim loss of future rent otherwise due under the contract is, in effect, an acceleration of the rent due over the life of the contract, since the landlord may give notice and bring the claim before the period of the tenancy has expired. Accelerated rent clauses are void under the new Act. This alone is a reason to find against the plaintiff on this issue. | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 15 March 2020
Boardwalk General Partnership v Fraser, 2013 CanLII 95665 (ON SCSM)
1. This is a damage assessment sought by Boardwalk General Partnership, the owner of an apartment building at 812 King St. W., Kitchener against Paul Fraser, a tenant in Apartment 408 in that building beginning in December, 2008.
2. According to the Affidavit of Service filed Mr. Fraser was served personally on July 4, 2012. He was noted in default on August 13, 2012.
13. I was not referred to, but have considered Yonge Pleasant Holdings Ltd. v. Dragonov (1995), 1995 CarswellOnt 2946 (O.C.G.D.). Mr. Justice Gibson in that case distinguished Lees and held that where the landlord gives notice to terminate a month to month tenancy the landlord cannot claim damages for loss of rent after the date of termination.
18. Section 15 of the Residential Tenancies Act, supra, on the other hand, abolishes acceleration clauses altogether. The right of a landlord to both terminate the tenancy for fundamental breach by the tenant and claim loss of future rent otherwise due under the contract is, in effect, an acceleration of the rent due over the life of the contract, since the landlord may give notice and bring the claim before the period of the tenancy has expired. Accelerated rent clauses are void under the new Act. This alone is a reason to find against the plaintiff on this issue.
