Motion to Dismiss (Frivolous)(LTB): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Appeals ==[http://canlii.ca/t/j5n16 Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)]== [24] It is difficult to assess whether the Tenant raises an error of law or wh...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Appeals]] | [[Category:LTB-Appeals]] | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/j5n16 Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/j5n16 Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)]== | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 3 June 2020
Okosun v. Minniti, 2020 ONSC 1354 (CanLII)
[24] It is difficult to assess whether the Tenant raises an error of law or whether it has any merit.
[25] An alleged error of law does not clearly appear from the Notice of Appeal. Yet, given that he is self-represented, the Notice of Appeal must be read liberally.
[26] The issue is whether the adjournment should or should not have been granted. While the appeal looks extremely “thin”, it is possible that it raises a genuine issue of law, I am not prepared to dismiss the appeal and deprive the Tenant a full opportunity to make submissions why his appeal should be granted.
