License to Occupy (TPA): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Trespass to Property ==Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC)== <ref name="Davidson">Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd...")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
==Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC)==
==Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC)==


[1] WILSON J.:—The jury has answered questions and rendered a verdict in this matter in favour of the plaintiff, Michael Davidson. Based upon the answers to the questions asked, counsel concede that there were no reasonable and probable grounds for the plaintiff’s arrest, which was made pursuant to the Trespass to Property Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.21 (the “Act”). This case raises a novel issue and a more fundamental question, however. Do the arrest provisions of the Act apply in the context of ticket holders with a licence to attend the premises? As this question has not been considered before, counsel asked me to provide reasons to clarify this question. In light of the jury’s answers to the questions asked, however, these comments are obiter.
[2] The plaintiff was arrested by three off-duty Metropolitan Toronto police officers while attending a Blue Jays game at the SkyDome on April 28, 1995. At the time of the arrest the plaintiff was told that he was arrested pursuant to the Act. The plaintiff alleges that the arrest was unlawful, and that the Blue Jays and the Metropolitan Toronto Police Board and the three named police officers involved (the Police) are liable for general, special, aggravated and punitive damages.


<ref name="Davidson">Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC), <http://canlii.ca/t/1wcl9>, retrieved on 2020-09-08</ref>
<ref name="Davidson">Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC), <http://canlii.ca/t/1wcl9>, retrieved on 2020-09-08</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 03:52, 9 September 2020


Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC)

[1] WILSON J.:—The jury has answered questions and rendered a verdict in this matter in favour of the plaintiff, Michael Davidson. Based upon the answers to the questions asked, counsel concede that there were no reasonable and probable grounds for the plaintiff’s arrest, which was made pursuant to the Trespass to Property Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.21 (the “Act”). This case raises a novel issue and a more fundamental question, however. Do the arrest provisions of the Act apply in the context of ticket holders with a licence to attend the premises? As this question has not been considered before, counsel asked me to provide reasons to clarify this question. In light of the jury’s answers to the questions asked, however, these comments are obiter.

[2] The plaintiff was arrested by three off-duty Metropolitan Toronto police officers while attending a Blue Jays game at the SkyDome on April 28, 1995. At the time of the arrest the plaintiff was told that he was arrested pursuant to the Act. The plaintiff alleges that the arrest was unlawful, and that the Blue Jays and the Metropolitan Toronto Police Board and the three named police officers involved (the Police) are liable for general, special, aggravated and punitive damages.

[1]

References

  1. Davidson v. Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Ltd., 1998 CanLII 14938 (ON SC), <http://canlii.ca/t/1wcl9>, retrieved on 2020-09-08