Talk:Test to Set-Aside a Default Judgement
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
An Overview of Concepts
Potential Prejudice
R. v. Korevaar, 2009 CanLII 42456 (ON SC)[1]
- [20] I agree with the Crown’s submission that in order to show that Mr. Korevaar’s right to disclosure was violated, he must satisfy the court that there was a reasonable possibility that the undisclosed material could have been used in meeting the case for the Crown, or in advancing his defence, and that the non-disclosure could affect the fairness of his trial. This is the meaning of prejudice in the context of this analysis.[2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 R. v. Korevaar, 2009 CanLII 42456 (ON SC), <https://canlii.ca/t/25584>, retrieved on 2022-12-07
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 R. v. Dickson, (supra), at paras. 22 and 33; R. v. Grant, [2002] O.J. No. 4008 (O.C.A.) at para. 3
