Tenancy at Will (Non-RTA)
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Meeser v. Meeser, 2010 ONSC 6230 (CanLII)[1]
The Corp. of the City of London v. Ordinal, 2010 ONSC 1998 (CanLII)[2]
[27] Rosenblood was applied in Hubbard v. Hamburgh, 1993 CanLII 5500 (ON SC), [1993] O.J. No. 2972 (Gen. Div.).[3] This was not an expropriation case, but does serve to confirm the continued existence of the concept of “tenancy at will”. At para. 24, Rapson J. adopted the following definition from Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th ed.:
- Tenant at Will: One who holds possession of premises by permission of owner or landlord but without a fixed term. Where land or tenements are let by one man to another, to have and to hold at the will of the lessor, by force of which lease the lessee is in possession. In this case the lessee is called “tenant at will” because he has no certain nor sure estate, for the lessor may put him out at what time it pleases him.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Meeser v. Meeser, 2010 ONSC 6230 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/2dk5b>, retrieved on 2021-02-01
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 The Corp. of the City of London v. Ordinal, 2010 ONSC 1998 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/299r7>, retrieved on 2021-02-01
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Hubbard v. Hamburgh, 1993 CanLII 5500 (ON SC), <https://canlii.ca/t/1vslw>, retrieved on 2021-02-01
