Constitutional Question, Bankruptcy & RTA Termination

From Riverview Legal Group
Revision as of 18:33, 4 November 2024 by Sharvey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Constitutional Law Category:Bankruptcy Category:Bankruptcy & Consumer Proposals (BIA) Category:Payment of Rent (LTB) {{Citation: | categories = [Constitutional Law], [Bankruptcy], [Bankruptcy & Consumer Proposals (BIA)], [Payment of Rent (LTB)] | shortlink = }} ==407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 397<ref name="407 ETR Concession"/>== <ref name="407 ETR Concession">407 ETR Co...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


🥷 Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2025 ©
Date Retrieved: 2025-04-03
CLNP Page ID: 2438
Page Categories: [Constitutional Law], [Bankruptcy], [Bankruptcy & Consumer Proposals (BIA)], [Payment of Rent (LTB)]
Citation: Constitutional Question, Bankruptcy & RTA Termination, CLNP 2438, <>, retrieved on 2025-04-03
Editor: Sharvey
Last Updated: 2024/11/04


407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 397[1]

[1]

Retrieved

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 397, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm22n>, retrieved on 2024-11-04
Retrieved from "https://riverview.legal/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Constitutional_Question,_Bankruptcy_%26_RTA_Termination&oldid=23995"