Due Diligence (Exercise of)
From Riverview Legal Group
🥷 Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2025 © | |
---|---|
Date Retrieved: | 2025-06-07 |
CLNP Page ID: | 2507 |
Page Categories: | [Hearing Process (LTB)] |
Citation: | Due Diligence (Exercise of), CLNP 2507, <https://rvt.link/fp>, retrieved on 2025-06-07 |
Editor: | Sharvey |
Last Updated: | 2025/06/05 |
Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV)
5. The Landlord claims she did not receive the notice by mail as that is not the correct address. The Landlord acknowledge receiving the notice of hearing by e-mail; however, it went to her junk mail folder. She did not check her junk mail folder until after the hearing.
6. In Q Res IV Operating GP Inc. v. Berezovs’ka, 2017 ONSC 5541 (Div. Ct.) (CanLII), the Divisional Court affirmed that a party to a Board proceeding must exercise appropriate diligence to be aware of and to attend a Board proceeding. In this case, I find the Landlord’s lack of diligence to be the reason why she did not receive the notice of hearing.
References
- ↑ Shewen v. Reid, 2024 ONLTB 25484 (LTB-T-056551-22-RV), <File:LTB-T-056551-22 RV.pdf, https://rvt.link/fo>, retrieved 2025-06-05