Category:OCF-1: Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Accident Benefits")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Accident Benefits]]
[[Category:Accident Benefits]]
==Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT)<ref name="Canavan"/>==
[1]        The applicant. was involved in motor vehicle accident on January 27, 2014.  The applicant states that as a result of this accident he sustained serious physical and psychological injuries.
  [2]        The applicant did not submit his application for accident benefits (OCF-1) to the respondent, Unifund, until more than 2 years had passed.  The parties have differing views on the exact date of the submission of the OCF-1 however, both parties agree that it was more than 2 years following the accident.
[3]        There is no dispute between the parties that the applicant submitted his OCF-1 outside of the prescribed timelines in section 32 of the Schedule[1]. <b><u>Instead, the preliminary issue before the Tribunal is whether he has a reasonable explanation for that delay that would permit him to proceed with his application for accident benefits.</b></u>
<ref name="Canavan">Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT), <https://canlii.ca/t/jdpxq>, retrieved on 2021-04-26</ref>

Revision as of 19:21, 26 April 2021


Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT)[1]

[1]        The applicant. was involved in motor vehicle accident on January 27, 2014.  The applicant states that as a result of this accident he sustained serious physical and psychological injuries. 
 [2]        The applicant did not submit his application for accident benefits (OCF-1) to the respondent, Unifund, until more than 2 years had passed.  The parties have differing views on the exact date of the submission of the OCF-1 however, both parties agree that it was more than 2 years following the accident.

[3] There is no dispute between the parties that the applicant submitted his OCF-1 outside of the prescribed timelines in section 32 of the Schedule[1]. Instead, the preliminary issue before the Tribunal is whether he has a reasonable explanation for that delay that would permit him to proceed with his application for accident benefits.

[1]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT), <https://canlii.ca/t/jdpxq>, retrieved on 2021-04-26

Pages in category "OCF-1"

This category contains only the following page.