Devoid of Merit (Appeal - LTB): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[36] An appellate court may quash an appeal where it is manifestly devoid of merit: <i>Leysork Holdings Ltd. v. Munden Acres Ltd. (1976) O.R. (2d) 430, 1976 CarswellOnt 300 (CA) at para. 18; Solomon v. Levy, 2015 ONSC 2556 at para. 34.</i><ref name="Solomon"/> | [36] An appellate court may quash an appeal where it is manifestly devoid of merit: <i>Leysork Holdings Ltd. v. Munden Acres Ltd. (1976) O.R. (2d) 430, 1976 CarswellOnt 300 (CA) at para. 18; Solomon v. Levy, 2015 ONSC 2556 at para. 34.</i><ref name="Solomon"/> | ||
:... | |||
[39] I find that the Tenant’s appeal is devoid of merit. I further find that it does not raise a question of law, which is required in order to appeal under s. 210 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17. I explain my reasons for this finding below. | |||
<ref name="Capreit">Capreit v. Veiga, 2022 ONSC 958 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jmkdf>, retrieved on 2022-04-03</ref> | <ref name="Capreit">Capreit v. Veiga, 2022 ONSC 958 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jmkdf>, retrieved on 2022-04-03</ref> | ||
Revision as of 16:17, 3 April 2022
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-05-05 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 1898 |
| Page Categories: | [Appeals] |
| Citation: | Devoid of Merit (Appeal - LTB), CLNP 1898, <>, retrieved on 2024-05-05 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2022/04/03 |
Capreit v. Veiga, 2022 ONSC 958 (CanLII)[1]
[36] An appellate court may quash an appeal where it is manifestly devoid of merit: Leysork Holdings Ltd. v. Munden Acres Ltd. (1976) O.R. (2d) 430, 1976 CarswellOnt 300 (CA) at para. 18; Solomon v. Levy, 2015 ONSC 2556 at para. 34.[2]
- ...
[39] I find that the Tenant’s appeal is devoid of merit. I further find that it does not raise a question of law, which is required in order to appeal under s. 210 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17. I explain my reasons for this finding below.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Capreit v. Veiga, 2022 ONSC 958 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jmkdf>, retrieved on 2022-04-03
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Solomon v Levy, 2015 ONSC 2556 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/gh8jg>, retrieved on 2022-04-03
