Estoppel: Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Blanked the page)
Tag: Blanking
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Legal Principles]]
[[Category:Small Claims]]
[[Category:Landlord Tenant]]


==The Defence of Estoppel==
===[http://canlii.ca/t/1j0dz BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. v. Wellington West Capital Inc., 2004 CanLII 33776 (ON SC)]===
[24]      To assert estoppel by convention, a party must demonstrate that both parties embarked upon a course of conduct based upon the same premise or assumption. See Amalgamated Investment & Property Co. Ltd. (in liquidation) v. Texas Commerce International Bank Ltd., [1982] 1 Q.B. 84 at 122 (C.A.) per Denning M.R.

Latest revision as of 16:03, 21 February 2020