Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:Commercial Tenancy]]
| |
|
| |
|
| ==[http://canlii.ca/t/2c5r8 Heger v. Varajao et al., 2010 ONSC 4603 (CanLII)]==
| |
|
| |
| '''III DISCUSSION'''
| |
|
| |
| '''A. Jurisdiction'''
| |
|
| |
| ::'''1. under Part III of Commercial Tenancies Act'''
| |
|
| |
| [75] The motion is brought pursuant to Part III of the [http://canlii.ca/t/52vtv Commercial Tenancies Act, s. 74].
| |
|
| |
| [76] [http://canlii.ca/t/52vtv Section 74(1) of the Commercial Tenancies Act] provides for the right of a landlord to make an application in respect of an overholding tenant:
| |
| ::74(1) Where a tenant . . . wrongfully refuses or neglects to go out of possession of the land demised to the tenant, or which the tenant has been permitted to occupy, the tenant’s landlord may apply upon affidavit to a judge of the Superior Court of Justice to make the inquiry hereinafter provided for and the application shall be made, heard and determined in the county or district in which the land lies.
| |
|
| |
| [77] The inquiry mentioned in s. 74(1) is addressed in s. 74(2):
| |
| ::74(2) The court shall in writing appoint a time and place at which a judge will inquire and determine whether the person complained of was a tenant to the complainant for a term . . . that has expired or has been determined by a notice to quit or for default in payment of rent or otherwise, and whether the tenant holds the possession against the right of the landlord, and whether the tenant, having no right to continue in possession, wrongfully refuses to go out of possession.
| |
|
| |
| [78] Particulars as to the form and content of the notice of the inquiry are dealt with in s. 74(2).
| |
|
| |
| [79] The title of a proceeding under s. 74(1) is described in s. 75 as being “styled . . . In the matter of (giving the name of the party complaining), Landlord, against (giving the name of the party complained against), Tenant.”
| |
|
| |
| [80] If the tenant appears, s. 76 (2) provides for a summary disposition:
| |
| ::76(2) . . . the judge shall, in a summary manner, hear the parties and their witnesses, and examine the matter, and, if it appears to the judge that the tenant wrongfully holds against the right of the landlord, he or she may order the issue of the writ.
| |
|
| |
| [81] An appeal lies to the Divisional Court under s. 78(1), and s. 78(2) reads:
| |
| ::78(2) If the Divisional Court is of the opinion that the right of possession should not be determined under this Part, the court may discharge the order of the judge, and the landlord may in that case proceed by action for the recovery of possession.
| |
|
| |
| [82] It is obvious that 214 Ontario Limited, despite saying so, is not proceeding under Part III of the [http://canlii.ca/t/52vtv Commercial Tenancies Act]. Yet, there is no obligation on a landlord to firstly proceed under Part III. It is open for a landlord to bring an action for recovery of possession, which is what 214 Ontario Limited did in its counterclaim.[48] Nevertheless, it is incorrect to say that the within motion is brought under Part III of the [http://canlii.ca/t/52vtv Commercial Tenancies Act].
| |
