Fire Pit in Yard (LTB)

Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved:	2024-05-18
CLNP Page ID:	2340
Page Categories:	Interference of Reasonable Enjoyment (LTB)
Citation:	Fire Pit in Yard (LTB), CLNP 2340, <https://rvt.link/am>, retrieved on 2024-05-18
Editor:	Sharvey
Last Updated:	2024/02/07

Szeto v Bernard, 2022 CanLII 127337 (ON LTB)

6. The Landlord’s representative spoke to the damage the pool and fire pit will cause to the grass. The notice served on the Tenants is not for damage. The representative also argues that these items constitute a breach of the tenancy agreement because the Tenants are not authorized to make changes to the rental unit.

7. The legal test for the N5 notice an interference with a landlord’s lawful rights and privileges must be substantial. I find that the Tenant’s having these items in the yard does not constitute substantial interference as required under the Residential Tenancies Act.

8. The request to terminate the tenancy based on the N5 notice is denied.

TEL-97380-18 (Re), 2019 CanLII 126906 (ON LTB)

1. On December 3, 2018, the Landlord served the Tenants with an N7 notice of termination alleging that an occupant or guest have an illegal open fire pit with garbage in it and are using the property as a construction waste site, storing metal waste; the tenants are parking their vehicle on the lawn.

2. The box on the N7 notice checked off by the Landlord indicates that the Landlord is asserting that this conduct is inconsistent with use as a residential premise and that has caused or can be expected to cause significant damage.

...

6. Having an open fire pit at a rental unit is not a use inconsistent with residential premises. People have bon fires outside their homes, especially in cottage homes. Similarly, storing items at the residential premises is not a use inconsistent with residential premises. People store items such as metal in their garage, sheds, etc.