License to Occupy v. Lease Agreement (Commercial): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | <ref name="Campbell">Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27</ref> | ||
==References== | |||
Revision as of 18:51, 27 July 2022
Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)[1]
[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.[6] I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27
