License to Occupy v. Lease Agreement (Commercial)

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.


Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII)[1]

[11] An agreement will constitute a lease if it grants, and was intended to grant, exclusive possession of the premises to the occupant.[2] I am satisfied that the agreement between Mr. Campbell and Tri-Echo was a sub-lease.


[1] [2]

Harvey v. Bingemans and Waterloo Region Police, 2022 ONSC 3905 (CanLII)[3]

[26] There is a difference between a license and a lease. A license is a permission to use a property. It does not convey a leasehold interest in the land. With a license, one becomes a licensee; with a lease, one becomes a tenant. There are similarities between the rights of tenants and licensees, but they are not the same. The concepts cannot be used interchangeably.

[27] A licensee is permitted to enter onto lands, with the permission or consent of the owner. A license gives the licensee the right to do something on the owner’s property, which the owner could otherwise prevent.

[28] Generally, a lease exists where the owner agrees to turn over exclusive possession of the property to another for a period of time. The conveyance of exclusive possession is an essential characteristic of a lease. A license, on the other hand, is an agreement that gives the licensee permission to use the land only at the owner’s discretion. A license is a revocable privilege.


[3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 4029 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j99fz>, retrieved on 2022-07-27
  2. 2.0 2.1 Stoneridge Travel Centre Inc. v. 1079334 Ontario Ltd., 2000 CanLII 27013 (ON CA), <https://canlii.ca/t/234fn>, retrieved on 2022-07-27
  3. 3.0 3.1 Harvey v. Bingemans and Waterloo Region Police, 2022 ONSC 3905 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jq25b>, retrieved on 2022-07-27