Non-Possessory Lien (RSLA): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Repair Storage & Liens ==[http://canlii.ca/t/glrl4 Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)]==") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==[http://canlii.ca/t/glrl4 Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)]== | ==[http://canlii.ca/t/glrl4 Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)]== | ||
[1] The appellant, Kevin Connolly, appeals from the judgment of Douglas J. which declared that the respondent, Advantagewon Inc., was entitled to a non-possessory lien under Part II of the Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. R. 25 (“RSLA”), in respect of the appellant’s 2011 Nissan Titan (the “Vehicle”). | |||
Revision as of 23:02, 18 May 2020
Connolly v. Advantagewon Inc., 2015 ONCA 709 (CanLII)
[1] The appellant, Kevin Connolly, appeals from the judgment of Douglas J. which declared that the respondent, Advantagewon Inc., was entitled to a non-possessory lien under Part II of the Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. R. 25 (“RSLA”), in respect of the appellant’s 2011 Nissan Titan (the “Vehicle”).
