Notice (Landlord Requires Possession): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Landlord Tenant ==[http://canlii.ca/t/gs695 TSL-62768-15-RV2 (Re), 2015 CanLII 100191 (ON LTB)]== 10. It is my belief that the Legislature intended to use the...")
 
(Blanked the page)
Tag: Blanking
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Landlord Tenant]]


==[http://canlii.ca/t/gs695 TSL-62768-15-RV2 (Re), 2015 CanLII 100191 (ON LTB)]==
10.  It is my belief that the Legislature intended to use the term “residential occupation” in section 48 of the Act to apply to those situations where the rental unit will either be lived in by the landlord or becomes incorporated into the landlord’s main living quarters. If a landlord is living in a house in which the basement of the complex is rented out, I am satisfied they are entitled to effectively reclaim use of the entire house by seeking possession of the rental unit for residential storage. <b><u>It is not uncommon in many single family homes to have the basement used in whole or in part for storage of property owned by its occupants.</b></u> Where the intended purpose of the rental unit is to become incorporated into the landlord’s main living quarters there is no change of use, it is residential occupation. <b><u>“Residential occupation” cannot reasonably be restricted in these circumstances to only include that portion of a house used for activities such as sleeping, cooking or entertaining. To suggest otherwise would mean that a landlord would have to effectively abandon the remainder of the house and live solely in the basement in order to establish an intention to use a basement for residential occupation.</b></u>

Latest revision as of 13:59, 11 March 2020