Rent Abatement (Principle): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Maintenance Obligations (LTB)]]
[[Category:Maintenance Obligations (LTB)]]


==[http://canlii.ca/t/h3r1s TST-78547-16 (Re), 2017 CanLII 28680 (ON LTB)]==
==TST-78547-16 (Re), 2017 CanLII 28680 (ON LTB)<ref name="TST-78547-16"/>==


17. The remedies sought by the Tenant are a rent abatement and compensation for lost income.
17. The remedies sought by the Tenant are a rent abatement and compensation for lost income.
Line 8: Line 8:


19. The Tenant’s request for compensation for loss income is denied. The Tenant had failed to prove a nexus between her loss income from her business and the disruption caused by the “offending” tenant.
19. The Tenant’s request for compensation for loss income is denied. The Tenant had failed to prove a nexus between her loss income from her business and the disruption caused by the “offending” tenant.
<ref name="TST-78547-16">TST-78547-16 (Re), 2017 CanLII 28680 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/h3r1s>, retrieved on 2021-12-30</ref>
==References==

Revision as of 19:36, 30 December 2021


TST-78547-16 (Re), 2017 CanLII 28680 (ON LTB)[1]

17. The remedies sought by the Tenant are a rent abatement and compensation for lost income.

18. Abatement of rent is a contractual remedy based on the principle that if you are paying 100% of the rent then you should be getting 100% of what you are paying for and if you are not getting that, then a tenant should be entitled to abatement equal to the difference in value. Here, it was the evidence before me that the monthly rent for the unit was $199.00. Given all of the evidence before me I am of the view that a reasonable lump sum abatement of the rent would be $30.00 for the period in question.

19. The Tenant’s request for compensation for loss income is denied. The Tenant had failed to prove a nexus between her loss income from her business and the disruption caused by the “offending” tenant.

[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 TST-78547-16 (Re), 2017 CanLII 28680 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/h3r1s>, retrieved on 2021-12-30