Retention of Article (RSLA): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Line 2: Line 2:


==[https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90r25 Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990]==
==[https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90r25 Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990]==
'''Retention of article
'''Retention of article


Line 15: Line 16:


:(4) If no effective objection is made, the lien claimant, at the expiration of the thirty-day period mentioned in subsection (2), shall be deemed to have irrevocably elected to retain the article and thereafter is entitled to hold or dispose of the article free from the rights and interests of every person to whom the written notice of the proposal was given.  R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 17 (4).
:(4) If no effective objection is made, the lien claimant, at the expiration of the thirty-day period mentioned in subsection (2), shall be deemed to have irrevocably elected to retain the article and thereafter is entitled to hold or dispose of the article free from the rights and interests of every person to whom the written notice of the proposal was given.  R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 17 (4).
'''Proper court
25 An application under this Part may be brought in any court of appropriate monetary jurisdiction.  R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 25.

Revision as of 21:19, 18 May 2020


Repair and Storage Liens Act, R.S.O. 1990

Retention of article

17 (1) A lien claimant who has a right to sell an article may propose, in lieu of selling it, to retain the article in satisfaction of the amount of the lien claimed by giving written notice of the proposal to the persons entitled to notice under subsection 15 (2). R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 17 (1).

(2) Where a person entitled to notice under subsection (1) gives the lien claimant a written objection to the proposal within thirty days of the receipt of the proposal, the lien claimant, subject to subsections (3) and (4), shall sell the article in accordance with section 15. R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 17 (2).
(3) Upon application to the Superior Court of Justice and upon notice to every person who has given a written objection to the proposal, the court may order that the objection is ineffective because,
(a) the objection was made for a purpose other than the protection of the interest in the article of the person who made the objection; or
(b) the fair market value of the article is less than the amount of the lien of the lien claimant and the estimated expenses to which the lien claimant is entitled under this Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 17 (3); 2000, c. 26, Sched. B, s. 18 (1).
(4) If no effective objection is made, the lien claimant, at the expiration of the thirty-day period mentioned in subsection (2), shall be deemed to have irrevocably elected to retain the article and thereafter is entitled to hold or dispose of the article free from the rights and interests of every person to whom the written notice of the proposal was given. R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 17 (4).

Proper court

25 An application under this Part may be brought in any court of appropriate monetary jurisdiction. R.S.O. 1990, c. R.25, s. 25.